News and Views from Dave Wilson

Archive for January 27th, 2011

Unpleasant Surprises

by on Jan.27, 2011, under Photography

Wow - talk about blatant IP theft! These guys will be receivi... on Twitpic

Most of my images are licensed under a Creative Commons license which allows non-commercial use without people having to contact me to ask permission. This has worked pretty well but occasionally I have to send letters to folks who are using pictures for commercial use – real estate agents and Wired.com come to mind. In most of these cases, the infringer decides to remove the image rather than pay for a license and in all of these cases so far, the infringement has been on a web site. Tonight, however, I experienced my largest and most blatant example of image theft.

On arriving home from work, I picked up a telephone directory that had been left at the end of the driveway and was amazed to discover one of my pictures on the front cover. At no point had I licensed this image to anyone for commercial use – it’s been sold as an art print a few times but not as a stock license. Looking through the directory, I found the same image used twice more in advertisements for the directory company. I have to assume that they found the image on Flickr and decided to use it in the hope that the owner would not complain. They made no attempt to contact me prior to using the image despite the fact that my contact details are clearly advertised on Flickr. Tomorrow, I’ll give them a call to check the circulation (probably around 100,000-150,000 given the number of households in the 4 counties they distribute the directory to) then invoice them for the usage. If they choose to ignore my gentle reminder, we’ll see where it goes after that.
Hamilton Pool near Austin, Texas

20 Comments :, , , , , more...

Good News for Architecture Photographers

by on Jan.27, 2011, under Photography

I’ve had run-ins with security guards in pretty much every city I’ve taken photographs in (oddly, though, not in Austin). Although I’ve never been stopped by a federal officer, I was rather happy to find this information on the net today (courtesy of Thomas Hawk). The linked document details the rights photographers have to take pictures of federal buildings and appears to be intended to stop Federal Protective Services officers from overstepping their authority when approaching people legally taking pictures outside their buildings.

This is one to print and keep in your camera bag if you are likely be be shooting near federal buildings, I suspect.

1 Comment more...

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!